JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON THE TROLLEY PROBLEM PDF

in ethics—the Trolley Problem—than Judith Jarvis Thomson. Though the problem is originally due to Philippa Foot, Thomson showed how Foot’s simple solution. These slides are for an Introduction to Philosophy course at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC, Canada. They talk about. By Judith Jarvis Thomson, Published on 01/01/ Recommended Citation. Judith Jarvis Thomson, The Trolley Problem, 94 Yale L.J. (). Available at.

Author: Kajikora Nikokus
Country: Sudan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 26 April 2014
Pages: 154
PDF File Size: 15.44 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.67 Mb
ISBN: 971-1-79244-194-6
Downloads: 68764
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shat

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons license.

Ambiguities in ‘Killing’ and ‘Letting Die’. Should I kill spiders in my home?

Trolley problem – Wikipedia

Fried – – Philosophical Quarterly 62 Robinson of Current Affairs go even further and assert that the thought experiment is not only useless but downright jarviw to jzrvis psychology.

Retrieved 23 December Evolution and Human Behavior. An eye in the sky from the movie of the same name — the reality of drone warfare. Variations Now consider now the second variation of this dilemma. Webarchive template wayback links Interlanguage link template link number Wikipedia articles needing clarification from February All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February Spoken articles Articles with hAudio microformats.

In the distance, you spot a runaway trolley hurtling down the tracks towards five workers who cannot hear it coming. However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues.

The rejoining variant may not be fatal to the “using a person as a means” argument.

History of Western Philosophy. Brian; Nystrom, Leigh E. On Killing and Letting Die. Retrieved 25 May Trolley problems have also been a topic of popular books. You can divert its path by colliding another trolley into it, but if you do, both will be derailed proble, go down a hill, and into a yard where a man is sleeping in a hammock. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  HELEN WILMANS THE CONQUEST OF POVERTY PDF

The further development of this example involves the case, where the fat man is, in fact, the villain who put these five people in peril. In an urban legend that has existed since at least the mids, the decision is described as having been made in real life by a drawbridge keeper who was forced to choose between proboem a passenger train and his own four-year-old son.

Killing, Letting Die, and Thomson. The claim that it is wrong to use the death of one to save judihh runs into a problem with variants like this:. As before, a trolley is hurtling down a track towards five people and you can divert it onto a secondary track.

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

Problems analogous to the trolley problem arise in the design of autonomous carsprobem situations where the car’s software is forced during a potential crash scenario to choose between yrolley courses of action sometimes including options which include the death of the car’s occupantsall of which may cause harm. Again, the consequences are the same as the first dilemma, but most people would utterly reject the notion of killing the healthy patient.

But, the thomsin on the secondary track is a fat person who, when he is killed by the trolley, will stop it from continuing on to the five people. The reason this might affect someone’s decision is that in this case, the death of the one actually is part of the plan to save the five. However, there is large man standing next to you on the footbridge. You are on a bridge under which it will pass, and you can stop it by putting something very heavy in front of it.

Trolley problem

She argued that moral theories that judge the permissibility of an action based on its consequences alone, such as consequentialism or utilitarianismcannot explain why some actions that cause killings are permissible while others are not. Inconsistent or are there other factors than consequences at play?

  ASTM B633-98 PDF

These thought experiments have been used to stimulate discussion about the difference between killing versus letting die, and have even appeared, in one form or another, in popular culture, such as the film Eye In The Sky.

Crash Algorithms for Autonomous Cars: Selim Berker – – Philosophical Issues 23 1: According to classical utilitarianism, such a decision would be not only permissible, but, morally speaking, the better option the other option being no action at all. The trolley problem is a specific ethical thought experiment among several that highlights the difference between deontological and consequentialist ethical systems.

You see a runaway trolley moving toward five tied-up or otherwise incapacitated people lying on the tracks. This page was last edited on 27 Iudithat This seems trivial since the trolley will never travel down it. To make the parallel as close as possible it may rather be supposed that he is the driver of a runaway tram which he can only steer from one narrow track on to another; five men are working on one track and one man on the other; anyone on the track he enters is bound to be killed.

The central question that these trollet bring to light is on whether or not it is right to actively inhibit the utility of an individual if doing so produces a greater utility for other individuals.