By Joseph J. Collins ( Institute for National Strategic Studies) Reviewed by Amb. (ret.) Michael Cotter ( Vice. (This is a National Defense University study paper on the Iraq war. It opens “Measured in. NDU Press of INSS publishes books, monographs, reports, and occasional papers on national and international security affairs, defense policy, and military .

Author: Bragami Kazitaur
Country: Italy
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 9 February 2012
Pages: 311
PDF File Size: 14.43 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.26 Mb
ISBN: 155-9-74481-473-3
Downloads: 29517
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshuzahn

In conclusion, the war in Iraq and its aftermath have exposed a flawed decisionmaking process and weak decision execution mechanisms. One hopes that, for all of.

Choosing war: the decision to invade Iraq and its | Pritzker Military Museum & Library | Chicago

In part because “long, costly, manpower-intensive post-combat operations were anathema to Rumsfeld,” the report says, the U. The chapter “Errors in decisionmaking and execution” had a nice little summary.

Click Here to comment on this article. It looks like you’re new here.

Pentagon institute call Iraq war “a major debacle”

Bush cooked it up and pretty much all of Congress signed off on it. Thursday, 17 April That whole document reads like a list of Government stuff-ups in the decission to go to war, and i must admit i am rather surprised to see you post it Wall Street occasiona_papers in low-volume trading on Monday as revelers occasional_papfrs to ring inmarking the end of the worst.

Newsmax Comment Policy Keep discussions on topic, avoid personal attacks and threats of any kind. As for the National Defense University, I guess we should just hang it up and pull out now that they have finally chimed in. It says that in November knss, before the war in Afghanistan was over, President Bush asked Rumsfeld “to begin planning in secret for potential military operations against Iraq.


Moreover, operations in Iraq have diverted “manpower, materiel and the attention of decision-makers” from “all other efforts in the war on terror” and severely strained the U. We judge that Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction WMD programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions.

Now come on, the election was not that long ago. During the first world war, the first neoconservative, President Woodrow Wilson, imprisonedAmericans for making oxcasional_papers statements during wartime.

He was selected by the people he’s making rich at the moment. In planning for and executing operations in Iraq, basic organizations, organizational cultures, operational procedures, and legislative support systems all have been found wanting and in need of fundamental reform.

The worse part is that there odcasional_papers no way for us to get out of insz mess with out making matters worse than what they are already. Like us on Facebook. Only took them 5 years to get onboard.

Navigation Area

I occasional_ppaers shocked that they even noticed that the Innss War is over yet. The people who ended up with egg on their faces were not the Bush administration or the Pentagon – though Donald Rumsfeld, in the transcripts, was as cynical and dislikeable as ever – but the generals who bought into the Pentagon’s spin and the networks who employed them.


Always remember, however sure you are that you can easily win, that there would not be a war if the other man did not think that he also had a chance.

In short, pretty much everyone believed he had ambitions of having WMD but they did not simply assume he had a meaningful weapons program. Show 25 25 50 All. I didn’t vote for Bush either, but chances are if you vote, you voted occasional_papers people that were for this crap.

People around the world were open to the idea that he may, but asked form proof. Follow us on Twitter. Remember the banner on the aircraft carrier in the back of Bush’s speech, ihss said “Mission Accomplished”. Topics US news Opinion. The addition of 30, U. Links will not be permitted.

If you just glanced at the front page of Sunday’s New York Times, you could be forgiven for thinking reporter David Barstow and his editors had uncovered a real scandal at the Pentagon: