Step 4. Record your findings and implement them. Step 5. Review your assessment and update if necessary. Source: indgpdf. structure with responsibilities pdf. 3 – Risk assessments Email: [email protected] Telephone: Planning 5 Steps to Risk Assessments pdf.

Author: Yolar Yozshut
Country: Andorra
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 12 May 2009
Pages: 12
PDF File Size: 7.66 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.54 Mb
ISBN: 895-1-50390-204-8
Downloads: 35922
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zoloshicage

HSE – Publications: Free Leaflets – Risk Assessment

Common Pitfalls of Risk Assessment and How to Improve The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments.

Open in a separate window. These modifications made the aircraft unsafe, but this wasn’t identified.

Received Jul 30; Accepted Sep 5. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Once the pipes had been installed, no system was put in place to reassess the safety of the pipes as time elapsed. The best results from these tools are achieved when a team of people undertake the risk assessment together. The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. HSL undertook an investigation and determined that the cause of the explosion was imdg163 to an underground pipe carrying Liquid Petroleum Gas LPG which had corroded.

To undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment takes time and ggov appropriate multi-disciplinary team of people. In addition, review of the risk assessment records indicated that corrosion of this pipe, and the subsequent hazards resulting from any corrosion, had not been identified.

The risk assessment nse should be multi-disciplinary including, for example, those who work in the area being assessed, a manager, a health and safety specialist and a person who is not closely associated with the work area.

It is important to note that ‘Sanctions include fines, imprisonment and disqualification’. Festival of Fireworks Ibdg163. The Health and Safety at Work Act places responsibility not only on employers but also on designers, manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that articles and substances are safe for use so far as is reasonably practicable, and on every employee while at work to take reasonable care of him or herself, and of any other person who hsw be affected by his or invg163 actions.

Introduction Prior to the UK had spent the preceding years generating a large number of Health and Safety laws focused on individual industries, and even individual regions of the country. HSE successfully prosecuted all parties, the Designer, the Contract Company and the Public Park Authority, for failing to protect the health and safety of both workers and use public.


In all cases, there was a loss of life that was completely avoidable if the risk assessment ind1g63 been completed properly and acted upon. Had these calculations determined the type strengthnumber and positioning of tethers and pegs?

Depending upon the level of harm and the probability, the risk is labelled as High, Medium or Low. Carrying out a detailed Quantitative Risk Assessment without first considering whether any relevant good practice was applicable, or when relevant good practice exists.

Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice

Making decisions on the basis of individual risk estimates when cumulative risk to society is the appropriate measure. Recognising that different laws for different industries was con fusing and complex, upbns UK Government set up a com mittee inled by Lord Robens, to recommend a way forward. Of anyone who designs, manufactures or supplies an article or substance for use at work to ensure that it is safe.

This flexibility is a great advantage but it requires judge ment too. Team B, once they have completed initial fabrication pass to Team C for finishing. ppubns

Links to Useful Health and Safety information

A specific approach in industry A may be inappropriate in industry B. Employ ers with five or more employees need to record the signifi cant findings of the risk assessment. The most usual source of error is between equipment or work areas.

The Designer failed to provide a full engineering speci fication for the structure which would have included load calculations in various wind conditions.

The risk assessment steps allow the generation of a list of risks but for many people it can beg the question ‘where should I focus, what are the biggest risks? All three glv the parties listed above had a responsibility to ensure the structure was safe but not one of them did so.

These tethers and pegs obviously failed to hold the structure in place.

Support Center Support Center. The Nimrod Review Report [ 11 ] stated that the failure was one of ‘leadership, culture and hxe. This occurred while members of the public were inside the structure and others were surrounding the structure as it fell back to earth. In addition, only 22 tethers were located after the incident. The Nimrod aircraft had been in service for over 30 years and had been modified twice.


HSL undertook an investigation and determined that the structure was tethered by 22 ropes and pegs distributed around the perimeter of the structure. The structure was designed for its artistic merit and the focus of the Designer was on the dream-like experience that participants would enjoy. The short guide to Health and Safety Regulation in the UK [ 3 ] provides a summary of the Health and Safety at Work Act and states ‘The main require ment on employers is to carry out a risk assessment.

HSL undertook a Review of Risk Assessment Practice in [ 12 ] and identified these and further common failings that are listed below: The resulting Robens Report [ 1 ] recommended ‘the unification within a single comprehensive framework of legisl ation of the main Statutes bearing on safety and health at work’ and ‘the establishment of a national Safety and Health Au thority’.

This was a multi-agency group to provide advice on public event safety. They have a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create.

Good practice is about making the commitment to ensuring that risks are as low as is reasonably practicable and maintaining that commitment, by risk review and mitigation, throughout the life of the activity being undertaken.

Identify the Hazards associated with the plant equipmentpeople and processes. The reason for placing the responsibility with the organisation creating the risk is that it is impossible for HSE to be expert in the operation of every technology and workplace, especially at the rate of technology development. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement. Three case studies are now presented to illustrate the consequences of not undertaking a suitable and sufficient risk assessment.

From this the required tethering configuration could have been scientifically deter mined.

For example; had the structure been designed to withstand wind conditions? Published online Sep