ENDOBUTTON ACL PDF

There are an estimated , ACL repairs in the US each year: most ACL tears occurs from noncontact injuries. The % of the knee ligament injuries. Among femoral cortical suspension devices, the EndoButton CL . to confirm the position of the EndoButton after ACL reconstruction (Fig 3). One device used for femoral fixation of ACL grafts is the EndoButton Continuous Loop (Smith & Nephew. Endoscopy, Andover, Mass). This device has been well.

Author: Maushicage Taugul
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 4 May 2016
Pages: 464
PDF File Size: 20.66 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.8 Mb
ISBN: 843-8-86068-864-9
Downloads: 4228
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardasar

The method of graft fixation is critical in anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction surgery. Success of surgery is totally dependent on the ability of the implant to secure the graft inside the envobutton tunnel until complete graft integration. The principle of EndoButton is based on the cortical suspension of the graft. The Cross-Pin is based on graft expansion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of EndoButton and Bio Cross-Pin to fix the hamstring graft at femoral side of porcine knee joints and evaluate whether they are able to support of loading applied on graft during immediate post-operative tasks.

A cyclic loading endobufton was applied with N of tensile force at 1 Hz for cycles. The displacement was measured at 20,and load cycles endobuyton quantify the slippage of the graft during the test.

The laxity during cyclic loading and the displacement to failure during single-cycle test were lower for the Bio Cross-Pin fixation 8. The Bio Cross-Pin There was endobufton significant difference between Bio Cross-Pin failure loading: Both are able to support the immediate post-operative loading applied N.

The results obtained in this experiment indicate that the Bio Cross-Pin technique promote stiffer fixation during cyclic loading as compared with EndoButton. Both techniques are able to support the immediate post-operative loading applied.

The anterior cruciate ligament ACL replacement with hamstring graft has been widely performed with positive results. This procedure, however, requires great care at postoperative period. Although the four-stranded hamstrings have higher strength and stiffness than patellar tendon Hamner et endobhtton. This factor makes the early postoperative period a critical time for successful surgery Becker et al. The fixation of graft is totally dependent of implant performance during this period.

A poor fixation can lead to graft slippage and result in knee instability or failure of fixation Fu et al. Furthermore, the slippage impairs endobuthon integration and ligamentization process Rodeo et al. EndoButton and Cross-pin are techniques based on different mechanical principles. The graft is suspended inside the bone tunnel by both techniques. The anchor point, however, is different. EndoButton is an extra-articular device made of metallic button and a polyurethane ribbon Endotape.

The button is supported by the external cortical portion of the bone Endotape links the graft to the not supported central part of the aco button. The Cross-Pin is an intra-articular device that traverses the joint and is stabilized with one tip fixed to the cortical wall and the other fixed inside cancellous bone. The graft passes around this pin to be fixed.

During the graft tension, the button and the pin endobhtton submitted to bending forces Figure 1. The diameter of Cross-Pin is higher than Endotape, increasing the volume when the tendon loops.

In theory, this effect causes expansion and compression of ednobutton graft against the tunnel wall resulting in highest strength Milano et al. Bio Cross-Pin one cortical support point.

ACL reconstruction suture button – ENDOBUTTON – Smith & Nephew

EndoButton external cortical support point. Previous studies have shown that the interference screws fixation on tibia is the weak point in ACL reconstruction when Bio Cross-Pin or EndoButton are used at femoral site Shen et al. The femoral site becomes the weak point in this case.

  GENT VIGILON MANUAL PDF

Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the mechanical properties and the failure mode of Bio Cross-Pin and EndoButton with respect to the fixation of Hamstring graft. Our hypothesis was that different mechanical principle to secure the graft inside the bone tunnel results in different performances not being able to support post-operative loading.

A porcine model was used to compare the laxity, the strength, the linear stiffness and the energy associated with each technique. Therefore, to evaluate the Cross-Pin and EndoButton performance for femoral fixation we apply the load directly on the graft. Fourteen porcine knees of Landrace specimens with 2 years old and kg weight were purchased from a commercial slaughterhouse in the state ready for consumption.

This method allowed for harvesting of the soft tissue. Each femur was dissected and the superficial flexor tendon with approximately 5 mm diameter was extracted and used as a double graft. The use of the autograft instead of an artificial graft was preferred to mimic the clinical practice of use a graft retrieved from the patient.

These grafts were then fixed to the femurs by the two fixation techniques: The fixation procedure followed the same clinical endobuutton established for ACL reconstruction at femoral side of human knees. A 6 mm over-the-top guiding device was used to locate the anatomical ACL insertion. The tunnel was drilled to match the graft diameter. A endbutton mm diameter bone tunnel was drilled in inside-out technique to the Endobuttln fixation.

After this, a 30 mm tunnel was drilled with a 9 mm diameter for the graft positioning. On the Bio Cross-Pin fixation a 9 mm tunnel diameter was drilled for the graft positioning. Immediately after the graft fixation, each femur was clamped to a custom device with bone cement PMMA and screws.

Therefore, the testing was conducted in a worst condition scenario. The free end of the graft was fixed in the load cell leaving a gage length of 30 mm to mimic the human intra articular ACL length Figure 3.

Each specimen was then submitted to cyclic and single-cyclic loading-to-failure test. The cyclic test started with a preconditioning static tensile load of 50 N for 2 min followed by load cycles at 1 Hz between 50 N and N.

The slippage of the graft-fixation device interface was measured indirectly through the graft lengthening after 20,and load cycles. This measurement combined the effect of the fixation device slippage and tendon stretch.

The procedure was sufficiently accurate for the purposes of this study, in accordance with clinical practice Kousa et al. Failure during cyclical loading was assumed to occur in cases in which a complete slippage of the fixation device was observed.

The values for the ultimate failure load, yield point load, displacement at ultimate failure load, displacement at yield load, linear stiffness, and energy were obtained from the load-displacement curves Hz sampling rate. The force x displacement curves was used to calculate these variables because we are not focusing the graft strain but the mechanical behavior of the whole system bone-graft-implant. The specimens were kept moistened by spraying with physiological solution 0.

A two-way split-plot ANOVA was used fixation technique — between factor; and displacement by cycles — within factor to test laxity during cyclic loading. The t student test was used to compare the ultimate failure load, the displacement at ultimate failure load, the yield load, the displacement at yield load, and energy between the two graft fixation techniques during the single-cycle loading test.

The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the linear stiffness variable. The probability level was set at 0. No fixation devices failed during the cyclic loading test. Table 1 shows the results of single-cyclic load-to-failure test. No significant difference of ultimate failure load, yield load, and energy was observed between the Bio Cross-Pin and EndoButton fixation.

  GUY BROUSSEAU SITUACIONES DIDACTICAS PDF

The EndoButton revealed a smaller standard deviation of ultimate failure load and yield load. The mean displacement at ultimate failure load and displacement at yield load for Bio Cross-Pin was significantly lower than EndoButton. The Endotape rupture was the most common failure mode.

This failure mode occurred in 5 cases.

Over the top or endobutton for ACL reconstruction?

The EndoButton was pulled out of the bone tunnel with plastic deformation of the button and left intact the Endotape in 2 cases. The Bio Cross-Pin broke in 5 cases, and the tendon failed in 2 cases. Studies in animal models have been widely realized to understand the biomechanical performance of several devices to fix the hamstring tendons in the femoral side in ACL reconstruction.

A variety of testing parameters were used in these studies, including the use of femur-graft-tibia complex, the direction of pulling out the tendon, the rate of loading, and cyclic test protocol.

However, the interpretation of implant performance at femoral site testing the whole complex may be difficult since that the fixation on the tibia fail before that on femur fails Shen et al. Therefore, the best way to assess the Bio Cross-Pin and EndoButton performance is to apply the loading directly at the graft.

The existence of different methods makes it difficult to compare results. Despite a lack of similar methods, however, the results obtained at present work were similar with others from literature Ahmad et al.

Our data showed that the Bio Cross-Pin fixation had lower laxity during cyclic loading than EndoButton. This superior performance means that the Bio Cross-Pin is more secure to support the loads applied during aggressive rehabilitation protocol. The laxity is related to loss of fixation by elongation of the graft, graft slippage, and plastic deformation of device.

The sum of these factors may increase the graft micromovement and delay graft healing Fu et al.

Previous studies have shown that the biomechanical performance of the Bio Cross-Pin is superior that the EndoButton during cyclic and failure loading test Ahmad et al. Despite any difference in strength observed during the failure test, Bio Cross-Pin was stiffer than EndoButton. In theory, the stiffness is an important variable to be considered. The fixation device enxobutton promote stiffness near the native ACL to avoid an excessive graft motion and knee laxity until graft integration, To et al.

A lower stiffness can, therefore, increase the displacement associated with anterior translation and may result in xcl unstable knee. Considering the energy that the femur-graft complex has absorbed up to the point of fixation failure, there was not differences between the both techniques evaluated. The yield load has been advocated as the most important variable to be evaluated in the performance of fixation Kousa et al.

In the present approach, the yield load is assumed to be the last point of linear region of load-displacement curve. Theoricaly, this point represents the fixation resistance before yielding. The first significant slippage of the graft occurs at this point.

Over the top or endobutton for ACL reconstruction?

The stiffness decreases and the fixation tends to fail. The Endobutton showed a yield point very close to the failure load when the endotape broke Figure 5. It happened in 5 cases. In two cal, the button pulled out the bone tunel with visible plastic deformation. When the failure did not occur in the Endotape, the displacement-load curve showed a different pattern.